Saturday, January 19, 2013
The term ‘fiscal cliff’ has dominated the
news in recent months. The meaning
centers on the role of government and how to fund its operation. The cliff represented the consequences if
proposed spending and taxing policy changes were not approved by both the
Senate and House of Representatives.
The political ideology of the president
and senate centers on increasing revenue to fund government operations via tax
collection. Taxes are certainly
appropriate to fund government; however, the larger question is the role of
government.
The primary role of government is defined
in Scripture as maintaining law and order based on God’s standard of justice.
“Let
every soul be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God,
and the authorities that exist are appointed by God. Therefore whoever resists the authority
resists the ordinance of God…For he is God’s minister to you for good… (And) an
avenger to execute wrath on him who practices evil…For because of this you also
pay taxes…” Romans 13:1-6
The Bible also indicates maintaining a
military is sanctioned by God which would require government funding.
“And Moses
said to the children of Gad and to the children of Reuben: ‘Shall your brethren
go to war while you sit here’? …And the children of Gad and the children of
Reuben spoke to Moses, saying: …‘Your servants will cross over, every man armed
for war, before the LORD to battle, just as my lord says.’” Numbers 32:6,
25-27
In the New Testament Jesus spoke in a
parable of the consequence of not funding the required military.
“…what
king, going to make war against another king, does not sit down first and
consider whether he is able with ten thousand to meet him who comes against him
with twenty thousand? Or else, while the
other is still a great way off, he sends a delegation and asks conditions of
peace.” Luke 14:31-32
Additionally the Bible describes wars that
will be waged in the future. Therefore,
taxes are sanctioned to administer law and order plus maintain an adequate
military presence.
Presently, however, some believe that
government should have a much larger role in the lives of the citizenry.
Proponents of larger government
participation believe that government should be a provider of benefits and
services in addition to those sanctioned in the Bible. Each additional proposed benefit and service
can be weighed against scriptural precepts.
The epitome of depravity is when government funds are used to protect
those who break God’s laws. While some
such additional government services are obviously anti-scriptural, others are
more subtle.
One of the more subtle anti-scriptural
ideologies held by the current administration is termed ‘the protection of the
middle class’. In essence the meaning is
equalization of the nation’s wealth among all citizens which is accomplished by
redistribution. That is a flagrant
attempt to usurp God’s authority.
“And you
shall remember the LORD your God, for it is He who gives you power to get
wealth.” Deuteronomy 8:18
The attempt to provide more
anti-scriptural benefits and services to citizens can lead to much more serious
problems. If there is a revenue
shortfall and deficit spending is required, a government must resort to
borrowing.
The Bible is quick to point out that one
of the curses for a nation that disobeys God’s word is for that nation to be a
borrower while blessings for a nation that obeys God’s words is to be a lender
nation. In addition:
“…and the
borrower is servant to the lender.” Proverbs 22:7b
Interestingly there are those at both ends
of the political spectrum who claim membership in the Christian
Brotherhood. That is confusing inasmuch
as there are many contemporary ideologies contrary to Biblical teachings. Jesus shed light on such
inconsistencies.
“You will
know them by their fruits…A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree
bear good fruit…” Matthew 7:16-20
Therefore, the fiscal issues facing this
nation can be evaluated to see if they are in sync with Biblical
teachings.
Every individual has the freedom to choose
whether to take the Bible seriously or dismiss it if they hold the conviction
that politics and Scripture should not be intermingled.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home