Friday, January 17, 2014
Conservatism according to Webster is ‘a
disposition in politics to preserve what is established; a tendency to prefer
an existing or traditional situation to change.’ It is quickly noted that the definition of
conservatism is nearly opposite to that of progressivism, a predominate tenet
of liberalism.
The polar opposite of the major political
parties in our great constitutional republic spells gridlock. The solution according to the liberals in the
senate is compromise, i.e. both sides should give a little to arrive at a
consensus.
The idea of compromise is even more
prevalent on the international scene. An
excellent example is the Palestinian demand to have a sovereign state in the land of Israel.
The United States
believes that Israel should
recognize Palestine as a sovereign state and is
encouraging Israel
to compromise and let it happen.
However, if the truth was made known, the Palestinians have absolutely
no intention of compromising; they want Israel destroyed so they can
‘reclaim’ the whole land as their own.
Should Israel compromise for the sake of a
pseudo peace? God addressed that issue
prior to the Israelites entering their promised land.
“When the
LORD your God brings you into the land which you go to possess and has cast out
many nations before you…and when the LORD your God delivers them over to you,
you shall conquer them and utterly destroy them. You shall make no covenant with them nor show
mercy to them…” Deuteronomy 7:1-2
Israel was to make no covenant or
treaty with their enemies. Compromise
was not an option then, nor is it a Biblical option today.
Paul addressed the issue of compromise in
his letters to the church at Corinth. He instead taught separation of members of
the Kingdom of God and the rest of the world.
“Do not be
unequally yoked together with unbelievers.
For what fellowship has righteousness with lawlessness? And what communion has light with darkness?” 2 Corinthians
6:14
Lawlessness means to transgress God’s
divine laws.
Lawless ones can also be described as
citizens of the world, from the Greek kosmos,
which means order, or arrangement. It
connotes the material and transitory vs. spiritual and eternal. The ‘world’ is presently dominated by the
evil one and the object of future judgment.
As such there is constant conflict between
the citizens of the ‘world’ and the children of the Kingdom of God. Jesus taught His disciples about the
conflict.
“If you were of the world, the world would
love its own. Yet because you are not of
the world, but I chose you out of the world, therefore the world hates
you.” John 15:19
Now let’s focus on the present political
gridlock between the senate democrats and those pesky tea partiers. Harry Reid insists that gridlock could be
eliminated if those radicals on the right would just compromise.
For example, consider the ongoing conflict
over raising the debt limit. If the debt
limit is raised to increase spending, then borrowing from other nations would
be required.
There is presently ample tax revenue to
fund the government as defined by the Bible.
Therefore, if the debt limit is raised to allow for more spending, then
funds would be used for non Biblical purposes.
In addition, borrowing from other nations is a sign of God’s disapproval.
Thus the question is, should conservatives
compromise God’s instructions to appease the opposition or should they stand
fast on Biblical principles.
For those who might think that it is more
important to eliminate friction and division among those governing, perhaps the
words of Jesus might shed some light on the issue.
“Do you
suppose that I came to give peace on earth? I tell you, not all, but rather division.” Luke 12:51
The principle of compromise is found
nowhere in the Bible. Either a person is
totally committed to the word of God, or totally rejects it. There is no such thing as a moderate
Christian.
And those who refuse to compromise God’s
principles will be hated more each day and each day the opposition continues to
blame conservatives for the gridlock in Washington.
Therefore, if the principles on which
conservatives stand firm are Biblically based, there will be division.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home