Friday, February 15, 2013
Many objective observers note that this
nation is presently extremely polarized relative to political ideologies. But does the division have a deeper meaning? There are those who believe that political
ideology should be kept separate from religion while others believe that the
Bible can help explain contemporary political issues.
And then there are those who believe that
Jesus would be the answer to all division and would bring peace to the whole
world when He was born.
“For unto
us a Child is born…Of the increase of His government and peace there will be no
end, upon the throne of David and over His kingdom, to order it and establish
it with judgment and justice from that time forward, even forever…” Isaiah 9:6-7
The wording ‘from that time forward’
reveals that peace would follow judgment and will be fulfilled when Christ
returns to earth and begins His rule during the millennial kingdom. But the purpose of His birth and mission
during His initial advent was substantially different.
“I came to
send fire on the earth, and how I wish it were already kindled! But I have a baptism to be baptized with, and
how distressed I am till it is accomplished!
Do you suppose that I came to give peace on earth? I tell you, not at all, but rather
division.” Luke 12:49-51
Inasmuch as history is presently between
Christ’s first advent and His return, the earth should expect division which is
proactively initiated and given by Christ Himself. He speaks of His impending sacrificial death
to redeem mankind which must first take place before He can bring peace on the
earth. He wishes that the time of His
return to judge the earth was already here.
The division He speaks of is the division between
those who accept His deity and gift of redemption versus those who choose to go
it on their own. According to the Bible
any other divisions among men are totally subsidiary to the ultimate division.
There are, however, correlations between
differing political ideologies and the ultimate division among men. There are many who believe that political
factions should be willing to compromise in order to solve national
problems. Even some ‘church’ spokesmen believe
there should be unity among factions.
Such tactics are not scripturally based and compromise is not a
scriptural principle.
God’s standard of justice and righteousness
are absolute and not subject to compromise.
The common and popular premise that ‘we should all get along’ for the good
of the nation is perhaps well intended but not backed by Scripture.
Christians are admonished to take a stand
for Biblical principles and not waiver.
Jesus also taught that taking a stand would cause division and hatred.
“And you
will be hated by all for My name’s sake…” Matthew 10:22a
“Then they
will deliver you up to tribulation and kill you, and you will be hated by all
nations for My name’s sake.” Matthew 24:9
Jesus also gave a warning to those who
would cave and deny Him.
“…But
whoever denies Me before men, him I will also deny before My Father…” Matthew 10-32
Just as there are those who will not
compromise Christ’s teachings there are those who adamantly take a stand
against Biblical teachings. Consider the
impasse presently between the administration and the House of
Representatives. The issues appear to be
irreconcilable. The issues can be
clearly identified as to whether they are scripturally based or not.
Therefore, division is present and should
be recognized as well as expected. It is
a sign of the times.
“Then He
also said to the multitudes, whenever you see a cloud rising out of the west,
immediately you say, ‘A shower is coming’; and so it is. And when you see the south wind blow, you
say, ‘There will be hot weather’; and there is.
Hypocrites! You can discern the
face of the sky and of the earth, but how is it you do not discern this time?” Luke 12:54-56
Thus there will be those who miss the ‘big
picture’ and focus on remedying political division while others will smile and
say to themselves, ‘God’s plan is right on schedule’.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home