Friday, August 7, 2015
The abomination of shedding innocent
blood, especially the life of a child, was addressed last week. The current issue; however, is the shedding
of blood of an unborn child. Is there a
difference?
And once again, the Bible is not silent on
the issue.
There is a great illustration in the Bible
addressing the issue. The illustration
features Abraham’s son Isaac and Isaac’s wife Rebekah. Isaac was frustrated that he and his wife
were childless. Isaac pleaded for
Rebekah to conceive and God responded.
“Now Isaac
pleaded with the LORD for his wife, because she was barren; and the LORD
granted his plea, and Rebekah his wife conceived.” Genesis 25:21
Not only was Rebekah with child, she was
carrying twins. She was having
complications with her pregnancy and she inquired to the LORD as to why.
“But the
children struggled together within her; and she said, ‘If all is well, why am I
like this?’ So she went to inquire of
the LORD.” Genesis 25:22
The Hebrew for ‘children’ in the present
context is exactly the same word used when the Israelites offered their
children to Baal. It means a young one,
or a youth.
God then explained to Rebekah that she was
carrying the progenitors of two distinct nations. In other words, God had a plan for each of
the twins before they were born. And
God’s plan was totally contrary to the law regarding birth rights.
“Two
nations are in your womb, two peoples shall be separated from your body; one
people shall be stronger than the other, and the older shall serve the
younger.” Genesis 25:23
Of course, the boys were Jacob and Esau.
This example was so significant that Paul
wrote of it two thousand years later.
“…when
Rebecca…had conceived by…our father Isaac (for the children not yet being born,
nor having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election
might stand, not of works but of Him who calls), it was said to her, ‘The older
shall serve the younger.’ As it is
written, ‘Jacob I have loved, but Esau I have hated.’” Romans
9:10-13
Paul confirmed that those in the womb are
children just as those who are born and live outside of the womb. There is no
difference in the eyes and mind of God.
God has a purpose for His chosen which has
been established long before the birth of His children. Therefore, His purpose doesn’t depend on the
actions of the children; it is preordained.
Is then the ‘age of accountability’ a
Scriptural teaching or a church tradition?
Consider further the numerous times in the
Bible when a person is called by name and their purpose revealed even centuries
before their physical birth.
Perhaps King David said it best as he
tried to express the majesty and sovereignty of God.
“My frame
was not hidden from You, when I was made in secret…Your eyes saw my substance,
being yet unformed. And in Your book
they all were written, the days fashioned for me, when as yet there were none
of them.” Psalm 139:15-16
David confirms that God’s purpose for His
chosen was set in ages past and their days determined and outlined before they
were even formed in their mother’s womb.
Their days are already numbered and recorded in the Book of Life.
Roe v. Wade has legally allowed the murder
of approximately 57 million children.
Such a law brings to mind the words of
Jesus to the Pharisees.
“Why do you
also transgress the commandment of God because of your tradition? ...Thus you
have made the commandment of God of no effect by your tradition.” Matthew 15:3,
6
The current issue of murdering unborn
children and harvesting their body parts for profit is clearly addressed in
Scripture.
Does the early commandment given to Noah
still apply? Everyone can decide for
themselves.
“Whoever
sheds man’s blood, by man his blood shall be shed; for in the image of God He
made man.” Genesis 9:6
And remember, a child is a child whether running
across the room into your protective arms or resting in peace within his/her
mother’s protective womb awaiting birth.
Share your thoughts
walt.thrun@gmail.com
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home