Friday, March 27, 2015
It is a nearly impossible for any student
of the Bible to adequately explain the title in 700 words, but here goes.
According to Scripture sin is universal,
i.e. everyone is guilty and a single sin will separate a person from God.
“…for
all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God…” Romans 3:23
In addition to that truth, man is
absolutely incapable of righting himself. Man has a problem.
“…knowing
that a man is not justified by the works of the law…for by the works of the law
no flesh shall be justified.”
Galatians 2:16
‘Justified’ means to be declared righteous
in the eyes of God. Justification is a
gift bestowed by God to fulfill that which man was created to be.
God’s gift does what the law could never
do.
“But now
the righteousness of God apart from the law is revealed…” Romans 3:21
The purpose of the law was to reveal God’s
standard of righteousness. Though a
man’s conscience provided some guidance, there were many aspects of God’s law
that natural man didn’t recognize as ‘sin.’
Even after God’s law was revealed, it was
absolutely impossible for man to completely abide by it.
God’s righteousness and justice are two of
His immutable attributes and He requires the same standard of all men. Therefore when a man is declared righteous he
attains spiritual union with God and likeness of His character.
God provided what man needed but couldn’t
provide for himself.
“…being
justified freely by His grace through the redemption…in Christ Jesus…” Romans 3:24
Redemption is a wonderful word, rich in
meaning. It means deliverance from
servitude because of a ransom paid; in the present context deliverance is from
the power and consequence of sin.
Paul then explains the price, or ransom,
paid for one’s deliverance.
“…Christ
Jesus, whom God set forth as a propitiation by His blood, through faith, to
demonstrate His righteousness…” Romans 3:25
‘Propitiation’ does in fact mean ‘mercy
seat’ which was the covering of the Ark of the Covenant. It was on the mercy seat that the blood of
the offering on the Day of Atonement was sprinkled which was proof an offering
had been slain.
Jesus was in fact, the Lamb slain from the
foundation of the world.
‘Faith’ exercised by the believer is the
grounds by which one receives justification.
Faith always means to take God at His word.
“Therefore,
having been justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus
Christ…” Romans 5:1
‘Peace’ is that which arises from being
reconciled with God. The enmity has been
removed by the death of Jesus Christ.
Being reconciled to God also delivers the
justified from God’s required wrath.
“Much more then, having now been justified by
His blood, we shall be saved from wrath…” Romans 5:9
‘Saved’ is salvation from eternal death,
sin, and its punishment. It further
means to give eternal life.
‘Wrath’ is God’s divine judgment required
by His holiness to be inflicted on the unredeemed, i.e. those who attempt to
attain righteousness by deeds of the flesh.
The sum of the matter?
“…It shall
be imputed to us who believe in Him who raised up Jesus our Lord from the dead,
who was delivered up because of our offenses, and was raised because of our
justification.” Romans 4:24-25
The vicarious sacrifice of Christ was
transferred to the account of all who believe God raised Him from the
dead. Christ’s death was payment for our
sins, and He was raised as proof that our justification was a done deal!
He paid a debt He did not owe; I owed a
debt I could not pay…
Christ’s death, burial, and resurrection results
in newness of life and are wonderfully portrayed in the sacrament of baptism.
“Therefore
we were buried with Him through baptism into death, that just as Christ was
raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in
newness of life. For if we have been
united together in the likeness of His death, certainly we also shall be in the
likeness of His resurrection…”
Romans 6:4-5
Happy Easter!
There! 700 words.
Share
your thoughts walt.thrun@gmail.com
Friday, March 20, 2015
Iran's prewritten history (Continued)
Then when Ezra returned to Judah
to rebuild the temple, he was met with Persian disdain once again. Ezra had been given permission by Cyrus to
return to Judah but when the
Persian overseers in Judah
got wind of the plan they were not pleased.
“Now when
the adversaries of Judah and Benjamin heard that the descendants of the
captivity were building the temple of the LORD God of Israel, they came…and said to them
‘Let us build with you, for we seek your God as you do…’” Ezra 4:1-2
Of course they had no intention of seeking
Israel’s
God. They were seeking a way to sabotage
the rebuilding of the temple.
Zerubbabel and Jeshua immediately saw
right through the scheme.
“You may do nothing with us to build a house
for our God; but we alone will build to the LORD God of Israel…” Ezra 4:3
The Jew’s inspired response caused their
enemies to do everything in their power to thwart the project.
“Then the
people of the land tried to discourage the people of Judah. They troubled them in building, and hired
counselors against them to frustrate their purpose all the days of Cyrus king
of Persia…” Ezra 4:4-5
And then later when Nehemiah and his
company returned to Judah to
rebuild the walls and streets of Jerusalem,
they also experienced Persian resistance.
As soon as they crossed over to the west of the Euphrates River,
the Persian governors rose up against them.
“When
Sanballat (Persian Governor) and Tobiah the Ammonite official heard of it, they
were deeply disturbed that a man had come to seek the well-being of the
children of Israel.” Nehemiah 2:10
Tobiah the Ammonite was a descendant of Lot’s son Ammon via an incestuous relationship.
Therefore, throughout Old Testament
history, there has been animosity between Iran
(Persia)
and God’s people, the Israelites.
Persians are also referenced in the New
Testament.
“Now after
Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king, behold,
wise men from the East came to Jerusalem, saying, ‘Where is He who has been
born King of the Jews? For we have seen
His star in the East and have come to worship Him.’” Matthew 2:1-2
The wise men from the East were magicians
from Persia. Do you suppose they knew Jesus was the one
Nebuchadnezzar dreamed about 600 years earlier who would crush the gentile
world kingdoms?
Note the phrase, ‘we have…come to worship
him.’ It brings to mind the words the
Persians in Judah
spoke to Ezra when they learned he had returned to rebuild the temple, i.e.
‘…for we seek your God as you do.’
Iran
(Persia)
will play a profound part in future history.
“Then the
sixth angel poured out his bowl on the great river Euphrates,
and its water was dried up, so that the way of the kings from the east might be
prepared.” Revelation 16:12
The ‘kings from the east’ were spoken of
by the Prophet Ezekiel. Ezekiel spoke of
gentile nations that God would draw into Israel and then let them destroy
themselves. He first mentions those from
present day Turkey and then
he identifies several other nations with animosity towards Israel.
“I will
turn you around, put hooks into your jaws, and lead you out, with all your army…a
great company with bucklers and shields, all of them handling swords. Persia, Ethiopia, and Libya are with them…” Ezekiel
38:4-5a
Their fate is described in detail in the
latter part of chapter 38.
Then the Apostle John reiterates
Ezekiel’s prophecy in Revelation 19 and adds details to the end of those
nations that came against Israel.
So Mr. President, do you think it is in
the best interest of America
to seek a covenant with Iran
whose stated goal is to totally destroy Israel?
Recall God’s words to Abraham, i.e. ‘I
will bless those who bless you and curse those who curse you.’ Will aligning with Iran
be a blessing to Israel
or a curse?
Inasmuch as the end has already been
written Mr. President, don’t you think the wisest strategy is to simply align
our priorities according to what has been blatantly revealed?
Share
your thoughts walt.thrun@gmail.com
Friday, March 13, 2015
Do we really want a covenant with Iran?
Iran
was formerly Persia and the
Bible refers to that nation as Persia
throughout their history and future.
Persia
is located east of Iraq and
east of the Euphrates
River. This area is presently the hotspot of the
world and will continue to be through the end of this age. In a very short time prophecy will be
history.
Recall the entire Bible is the fulfillment
of the covenant God made with Abraham approximately 4,000 years ago.
Abraham was called by God to leave the
land of the east and journey to a new land west of the Euphrates River. Abraham’s nativity was between the Euphrates
and Tigris rivers, i.e. the present country of Iraq. It is difficult to positively identify the
borders between ancient Babylon and Persia.
“And Joshua
said to all the people, ‘Thus says the LORD God of Israel:’ “Your fathers…dwelt on the
other side of the River in old times; and they served other gods. Then I took your father Abraham from the other
side of the River, led him throughout all the land of Canaan…”’” Joshua 24:2-3a
Now recall that Abraham sent Ishmael and
his family back to the east which included Arabia
and points further east. There was
continued enmity between Abraham and his descendants and ‘them of the east.’
Biblical prophecy and history reveals that
the Babylonian kingdom was supplanted by the Medes and Persians in
approximately 535 BC.
Judah
had been deported to Babylon
beginning in 605 BC. God had sent the
young Hebrew Daniel to Babylon
to write world history in advance from there.
In the second year of the Babylonian king
Nebuchadnezzar’s reign, he had a dream which only Daniel could interpret.
“You, O
king, were watching; and behold, a great image! ... and its form was
awesome. This image’s head was of fine
gold, its chest and arms of silver…” Daniel 2:31-32a
Daniel told Nebuchadnezzar that he was the
king of gold and the next kingdom consisting of silver would be the Medes and
Persians. The Persian kingdom would be
followed by the Greeks and then Rome. But we’ll concentrate on the Persian Kingdom in the present context.
It is significant to note the future of
the foreseen world kingdoms.
“You
watched while a stone was cut out without hands, which struck the image on its
feet…Then the iron, the clay, the bronze the silver, and the gold were crushed
together, and became like chaff from the summer threshing floors; the wind
carried them away so that no trace of them was found...” Daniel
2:34-35a
The four kingdoms defined by metals with
decreasing atomic weights (but with increasing brittleness) followed the
Egyptian and Assyrian for a total of six.
The seventh and final world kingdom has been identified in previous
columns.
The major point in the preceding Scripture
passage is when Christ returns to earth He will totally obliterate the final
world kingdom, which will include Iran
(Persia),
and there will be no trace of that kingdom or previous gentile kingdoms.
Animosity between Iran and Israel has prevailed through the
ages.
Such hatred and persecution was confirmed
when a remnant of Jews returned to Judah after their Babylonian
captivity to rebuild their temple and city.
Their odyssey actually began while still in
the Persian capital, Shushan. Esther was
a young and beautiful Jewish lady who was raised by her uncle Mordecai. Also living in Shushan at that time was a man
named Haman, an Agagite of the family of Amelek who were enemies of the Jews
since the time of the Exodus. Amelek was
a grandson of Esau and the progenitor of the Amalekites.
Haman was promoted by the Persian king
Ahasuerus to a position of great power in Persian’s capital city. It became known to Haman that Mordecai would
not bow down to him and ‘Haman was filled with wrath.’
“But
he disdained to lay hands on Mordecai alone…Instead Haman sought to destroy all
the Jews who were throughout the whole kingdom of Ahasuerus
– the people of Mordecai.” Esther
3:6
Persian genocide of the Jews was the plan,
but history revealed how Haman’s plan backfired.
To be continued.
Share your thoughts walt.thrun@gmail.com
Friday, March 6, 2015
Is our President a Christian?
Governor Scott Walker was asked recently
whether he thought the president was a Christian. He answered appropriately that it was not up
to him to judge the president’s Christian faith or the lack thereof.
Since then many have offered opinions on
the subject stating that the president’s actions and ideology identify his mindset. That is Biblically correct.
On the Sermon on the Mount Jesus did moreover
explain how to tell if a person is true of false, i.e. authentic or imitation. A person does in fact reveal himself/herself
by what they say and what they do.
“For a good tree does not bear bad fruit,
nor does a bad tree bear good fruit. For
every tree is known by its own fruit.” Luke
6:43-45
The next thing then, is to identify
examples of ‘bad’ fruit. For that we’ll
refer to the Apostle Paul. In his letter
to the Christians in Rome Paul listed numerous acts and practices that are
condemned. We’ll list a small portion of
them that tend to focus on one’s political ideology and personal benchmark for their
perceived standard of justice.
“…murder,
strife, deceit…proud, boasters…undiscerning, untrustworthy…” Romans 1:29-31
Let’s take them one by one. The Greek for ‘murder’ in the present context
means ‘slaughter’ or ‘cut to pieces.’
Some would say that defines late term abortions.
The next one is ‘strife’ which in the
Greek means ‘contention,’ or ‘love of strife.’
Then there is ‘deceit’ meaning
‘craftiness,’ ‘bait,’ ‘guile,’ or ‘despiteful.’
‘Proud’ means ‘arrogant’ while ‘boasters’
defines those who wrong others for the pleasure the affliction brings.
The ‘undiscerning’ describes those lacking
understanding while ‘untrustworthy’ describes those whose word cannot be
trusted as truth, or one who goes back on his word.
Equally significant is the following verse
in the foregoing Roman passage.
“…Who knowing
the righteous judgment of God, that those who practice such things are
deserving of death, not only do the same but also approve of those who practice
them.” Romans 1:32
Paul is saying that no one is totally
innocent of all the condemnable actions or practices that he lists.
In other words if a government leader, in
any branch of government, votes for or approves legislation or issues executive
orders to protect those who break God’s laws; such a proponent is just as
guilty as the one who actually breaks any of the specific laws listed.
There is, however; a Biblical principle
that came to light recently that many believe the president can relate to.
“You have
heard that it was said, ‘You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But
I say to you, love your enemies, bless those who curse you, and do good to
those who hate you…” Matthew 5:43-44
Jesus succinctly summarized the mindset of
one who claims to love Him, i.e. a Christian.
“If
you love Me, keep My commandments.”
John 14:15
Even before the Israelites entered the
Promised Land Moses told them in advance not only what they would do, but what
they would think. He told them that they
would insist on having a king.
God already had that planned and He would
provide a king in His timing. The king
that God would choose would be one of their brethren; he could not be a
foreigner. In other words he must have
the same ideology, values, and agenda as outlined in God’s word.
The king should not depend on a strong
defense for protection nor trust in national coalitions. His trust should be placed in the One who
appointed him.
In addition:
“Also it
shall be, when he sits on the throne of his kingdom, that he shall write for
himself a copy of this law in a book, from the one before the priests, the
Levites…and he shall read it all the days of his life, that he may learn to
fear the LORD his God and be careful to observe all the words of this law and
these statutes, that his heart may not be lifted above his brethren…” Deuteronomy
17:18-20
Notice, the same law would apply to the
priests and the king.
The sum of the matter?
“Therefore
by their fruits you will know them.” Matthew 7:20
Share your thoughts walt.thrun@gmail.com